Contract obligation management software: which vendors publish AI extraction, compared (2026)

What to evaluate in obligation management

Extraction is the easy half of the job. Six questions separate vendors quickly.

• Scope: does the AI extract obligations (who owes what, by when) or only key terms and dates such as renewal and notice periods? Vendors use the words interchangeably; their pages do not.
• Ownership and alerts: is each obligation assigned to a named person, and who is alerted before a deadline?
• Review: can a person confirm or correct every extracted row, and does each row point back to its source clause?
• Where obligations land: in a contract-only list, or in the same register as statutory and licence obligations?
• India fit: Indian entity or office, data region, e-stamping and Aadhaar or DSC signing in the same flow, and whether pricing is available in rupees.
• Commercials and data: how pricing is set, where data is hosted, and whether the vendor states that customer contracts are not used to train models.

IntelloSync (IntelloContract and IntelloComply)

We build this product, so read this section as the vendor's own account; the other sections are taken from each vendor's pages. IntelloSync says IntelloContract extracts obligations from executed contracts with AI and suggests them into a register for a person to review, with each obligation assigned an owner and carrying reminders. It says that in IntelloComply, contract obligations sit in the same register as statutory ones, tagged as contractual. IntelloSync is headquartered in Gurugram, Haryana, and is priced per module with unlimited users, without published price figures.

Icertis

Icertis publishes Vera Obligations, which it describes as AI-assisted discovery, extraction and classification of obligations from contracts. Published features include role-based workflows that assign each obligation to an owner, dashboards for status and deadlines, alerts to owners, and capture of fulfilment evidence for audit. The page read does not state an India presence, pricing, or a data-hosting position.

Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper publishes a Contract Obligation Extraction Agent that structures key dates and commitments for tracking, a clause review agent, and a Renewal Guard agent that flags auto-renewals approaching their notice deadline. It says each suggested value should be reviewed against the source text. Pricing is quote-only, in tiers set by the number of third parties managed, with AI included. Its Trust Center lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2. Owner assignment for obligations and data-hosting location are not published on the pages read.

LinkSquares

LinkSquares publishes Contract Intelligence that identifies provisions, obligations and metadata, with more than 120 extracted data points including key dates, payment terms, renewal windows and obligation milestones. It offers dashboards for upcoming renewals and obligations. Hosting is in the United States on AWS, with SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 stated, and pricing is quote-only. Owner assignment of obligations and an India presence are not published.

LexComply (LexKontract)

LexComply's LexKontract page says AI surfaces critical clauses, key dates and party obligations, and that users can track commitments and milestones with AI-powered alerts and dashboards. LexComply lists a New Delhi office and AWS hosting, and says it uses no third-party AI subscriptions. Pricing is not published. Its FAQ says negotiation of non-standard terms and legal assessment of risk stay with counsel, and third-party e-signing is a chargeable add-on. It is the same vendor covered in our compliance guide.

Lexplosion (Komtrakt)

Lexplosion (Kolkata) sells Komtrakt, whose contract page carries an AI obligation tracking heading and says users upload contracts and AI identifies key contractual terms and obligations. Its pages also list milestone tracking, approvals and reminders. Lexplosion states ISO 27001 certification on its homepage. Pricing, data-hosting location and owner assignment of obligations are not published on the pages read. It is the same vendor covered in our compliance guide.

Vendors that publish key-term and date extraction

These vendors extract fields that drive reminders, which is useful, but their pages read do not describe extraction of obligations as such.

• SpotDraft (Bengaluru): AI Smart Data Capture extracts over 1,000 types of contract metadata, such as payment terms and renewal dates. Its security page lists India among data regions. Obligation tracking and assignment are not published; pricing is quote-only.
• Contracts 365: an extraction companion for contract summary, counterparty, effective date, notice period, end-of-term date, governing law and payment terms. Its homepage FAQ says AI tracks obligations after execution. Documents stay in the customer's Microsoft 365 and the vendor states it never uses customer data to train models. Pricing is quote-only.
• ContractSafe: AI extracts key terms and dates, and a person accepts, corrects or skips each value. It is the only vendor here with a published starting price: from USD 450 a month, with unlimited users on all plans, set by feature tier and contract volume. It states it does not use customer data to train AI models, and offers US, EU, Canada and Australia data residency. No India office or rupee pricing is published on the pages read.

Others that publish little on extraction

On its homepage, Legistify (Gurugram) mentions tracking obligations and automatic reminders for key dates but does not say AI extracts obligations; its help centre was not read. Zoho Contracts publishes an obligation module and says eStamping and Aadhaar eSign are available depending on region, without saying AI extracts obligations. Workday's contract intelligence publishes extraction of common contract terms and custom AI models to track any term of interest. Sirion and Ironclad also market obligation features; their pages could not be read in full on 25 October, so they are not assessed here.

How to test it in a trial

Accuracy figures in a deck depend on the corpus. Test with your own paper.

• Load ten executed contracts that include a scanned copy, an amendment and a side letter.
• Count the obligations a person finds by hand first, then count what the tool missed, not only what it found.
• Check that each extracted row names an owner and links to its clause, and that a person can reject it.
• Add an obligation with no fixed date, such as a duty that starts on termination, and see whether it is stored as conditional or invented a date.
• Ask where the obligation appears if your compliance team also needs it.